Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: ehci update

2010-04-14 Thread Jan Kiszka
David S. Ahern wrote: > > On 04/13/2010 07:20 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: > It still needs a lot of love, but definitely an improvement from the > last version. The biggest difference for the performance boost and > stability is discovering that the usbfs in linux limits transactions to

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: ehci update

2010-04-13 Thread David S. Ahern
On 04/13/2010 07:20 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: It still needs a lot of love, but definitely an improvement from the last version. The biggest difference for the performance boost and stability is discovering that the usbfs in linux limits transactions to 16k versus the EHCI spe

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: ehci update

2010-04-13 Thread Alexander Graf
On 14.04.2010, at 01:50, David S. Ahern wrote: > > > On 04/13/2010 05:35 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> David S. Ahern wrote: >>> After a month of code refactoring and clean ups, etc, I thought I would >>> send along an update. The attached patch is relative to your ehci >>> branch; I also attached t