Anthony Liguori wrote:
> I like this idea but I have some suggestions about the general approach.
> I think instead of defining another machine type, it would be better to
> just have a command line option like -cpuid that took a comma separate
> string of features with "all" meaning all features t
Paul Brook wrote:
I think qemu-cvs has a -cpu option for non-x86 which could be used for
this. Agree machine types are the wrong approach.
Yep, machine types are already used to switch between a different concept
so using the new -cpu option would make sense. Could perhaps extend the
sy
> > I think qemu-cvs has a -cpu option for non-x86 which could be used for
> > this. Agree machine types are the wrong approach.
>
> Yep, machine types are already used to switch between a different concept
> so using the new -cpu option would make sense. Could perhaps extend the
> syntax so that
