On 05/20/2010 07:49 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Hi,
Well. You can't have both. We can have a efficiently packed format
(i.e.
two bitmaps). Or we can do it in a way which doesn't need parsing,
but that
wouldn't be the most compact format ...
You're right, so packing or introducing a small conve
Hi,
Well. You can't have both. We can have a efficiently packed format (i.e.
two bitmaps). Or we can do it in a way which doesn't need parsing,
but that
wouldn't be the most compact format ...
You're right, so packing or introducing a small conversion function is
not critical. I'd still prefe
On 05/19/2010 01:57 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
On 5/19/10, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Then there would be no need of parsing.
You would need _two_ bitmaps (e.g. mask and cursor, so that mask=1
gives
transparent, mask=0 cursor=0 gives black and mask=0
