On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> This will wreak havoc on the tree since these are built by default and
>> they are replacing files in revision control.
> ... the next question is why are they (linuxboot.bin and multiboot.bin)
> in revision control since the
> This will wreak havoc on the tree since these are built by default and
> they are replacing files in revision control.
... the next question is why are they (linuxboot.bin and multiboot.bin)
in revision control since they do not require any strange tool to be built.
>>> They req
Paolo Bonzini a écrit :
> On 01/08/2010 08:57 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> Paolo Bonzini a écrit :
>>> On 01/07/2010 09:03 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
This will wreak havoc on the tree since these are built by default and
they are replacing files in revision control.
>>> ... the next quest
On 01/08/2010 08:57 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Paolo Bonzini a écrit :
On 01/07/2010 09:03 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
This will wreak havoc on the tree since these are built by default and
they are replacing files in revision control.
... the next question is why are they (linuxboot.bin and mu
Paolo Bonzini a écrit :
> On 01/07/2010 09:03 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> This will wreak havoc on the tree since these are built by default and
>> they are replacing files in revision control.
>
> ... the next question is why are they (linuxboot.bin and multiboot.bin)
> in revision control sin
