On 08.07.2011, at 16:55, Alexander Graf wrote:
> I see. Qemu always gives you "best performance", as it can't throttle the
> guest
>:). Btw, I'd be happy to merge your custom board (or at least some components
>of
>it if they are reasonably mainstream) upstream, if you think it makes sense
On 08.07.2011, at 04:55, Lê Đức Tài wrote:
> On 30.06.2011, at 15:24, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> > On 30.06.2011, at 04:11, Lê Đức Tài wrote:
> >
> > > Thank for your answer.
> > > Beside nbench, I'm also using Dhrystone to measure the guest cpu
> > performance.
> > > The performance does
On 30.06.2011, at 15:24, Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 30.06.2011, at 04:11, Lê Đức Tài wrote:
>
> > Thank for your answer.
> > Beside nbench, I'm also using Dhrystone to measure the guest cpu
>performance.
>
> > The performance does not much diffetence too.
> > Is the emulated guest per
Hi... :)
2011/6/29 Lê Đức Tài :
> Hi,
> I have a question about performance of Qemu for powerpc.
> When I'm changing the CPU clock for taihu board from 33Mhz to 330Mhz by
> setting the PLL value, the performance of Guest OS is not increased. I use
> nbench to measure the guest performance.
> Is qe
