On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 4:57 AM, Prathmesh Kallurkar
wrote:
> 1. Did you get the guest physical address for the load/store instructions?
> No, I am getting the guest virtual address for the load and store
> instructions.
>
>
>>
>> 2. The code you pasted seems translated code. The number of input c
1. Did you get the guest physical address for the load/store instructions?
No, I am getting the guest virtual address for the load and store
instructions.
> 2. The code you pasted seems translated code. The number of input code
> could be smaller than this. So don't you think we should trap the
Hi, Prathmesh
I am working on getting the guest memory trace too. You said you have
trapped the guest memory access for most instructions. I have three
questions.
1. Did you get the guest physical address for the load/store instructions?
2. The code you pasted seems translated code. The number of i
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Prathmesh Kallurkar
wrote:
> Sorry friends for the misleading instructions in the previous mail.
>
> cmp ecx, [r12+0x4]
> mov r10b, [r13+0x0]
> mov byte [rax+0xf], 0x0
> mov byte [rax+rdx], 0x0
>
> It seems all the above instructions are getting covered with t
Sorry friends for the misleading instructions in the previous mail.
cmp ecx, [r12+0x4]
mov r10b, [r13+0x0]
mov byte [rax+0xf], 0x0
mov byte [rax+rdx], 0x0
It seems all the above instructions are getting covered with the
tcg_gen_ld/st helpers.
But now I have stumbled upon another problem :
I
