Re: [Qemu-devel] QOM: stability expectations of introspectable class_init data

2013-02-15 Thread Eduardo Habkost
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 08:22:31AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote: > Eduardo Habkost writes: > > > Hi, > > > > This is an attempt to summarize my main question from the thread: > > Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v5] target-i386: Slim conversion to X86CPU > > subclasses + KVM subclasses > > > > My main un

Re: [Qemu-devel] QOM: stability expectations of introspectable class_init data

2013-02-15 Thread Anthony Liguori
Eduardo Habkost writes: > Hi, > > This is an attempt to summarize my main question from the thread: > Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v5] target-i386: Slim conversion to X86CPU subclasses > + KVM subclasses > > My main unanswered question is about the "stability" expectations of the > introspectable cla

Re: [Qemu-devel] QOM: stability expectations of introspectable class_init data

2013-02-15 Thread Eduardo Habkost
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 02:35:26PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote: > On Fri, 15 Feb 2013 10:50:16 -0200 > Eduardo Habkost wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > This is an attempt to summarize my main question from the thread: > > Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v5] target-i386: Slim conversion to X86CPU > > subclasses +

Re: [Qemu-devel] QOM: stability expectations of introspectable class_init data

2013-02-15 Thread Igor Mammedov
On Fri, 15 Feb 2013 10:50:16 -0200 Eduardo Habkost wrote: > Hi, > > This is an attempt to summarize my main question from the thread: > Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v5] target-i386: Slim conversion to X86CPU > subclasses + KVM subclasses > > My main unanswered question is about the "stability" expec