Am 10.01.2012 00:56, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> On 01/09/2012 05:22 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Am 09.01.2012 22:42, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
>>> If there's some piece of QEMU you care about, start writing tests and
>>> tie it into make check. It's that simple :-)
>>
>> Not quite. It would be eas
On 01/10/2012 03:57 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 10.01.2012 00:56, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On 01/09/2012 05:22 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 09.01.2012 22:42, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
If there's some piece of QEMU you care about, start writing tests and
tie it into make check. It's that simple :-
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 08:39:07 +
Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 10:04:38AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > The general rules for 'make check-quick':
> >
> > 1) It must complete in less than 10 minutes start to finish (the
> > entire rule). We can re-examine this over time
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 10:04:38AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> The general rules for 'make check-quick':
>
> 1) It must complete in less than 10 minutes start to finish (the
> entire rule). We can re-examine this over time but for now, it
> seems like a reasonable limit.
>
> 2) It must gra
On 10 January 2012 14:49, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Haven't checked the kernel for Cortex-R4F support yet but my board
> doesn't really support it memory-wise (unless there's sufficient RAM to
> boot via CAN, but point is, not all boards are manufactured for Linux).
Also R profile doesn't have an M
Am 10.01.2012 00:56, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> On 01/09/2012 05:22 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Am 09.01.2012 22:42, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
>>> On 01/09/2012 02:57 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 09.01.2012 20:28, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> We're still short on infrastructure right now so
On 01/09/2012 05:22 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 09.01.2012 22:42, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On 01/09/2012 02:57 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 09.01.2012 20:28, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
We're still short on infrastructure right now so I expect that a lot of
stuff will get merged without tests at
Am 09.01.2012 20:28, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> On 01/09/2012 11:47 AM, Paul Brook wrote:
>> - What level of testing is appropriate? As a maintainer when can/should I
>> bounce a patch due to lack of tests?
>
> Yes.
Note the "when". :)
>> e.g should new device emulation come with
>> unit tests?
Am 09.01.2012 22:42, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> On 01/09/2012 02:57 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Am 09.01.2012 20:28, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
>>> We're still short on infrastructure right now so I expect that a lot of
>>> stuff will get merged without tests at first. As we get more test
>>> infra
Am 09.01.2012 17:04, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
Hi,
I'm going to apply this series quickly and will start running 'make
check-quick' as part a sniff test before pushing patches.
I'd like to request that all maintainers/submaintainers do the same
and that everyone contributes unit tests to this
On 01/09/2012 02:57 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 09.01.2012 20:28, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On 01/09/2012 11:47 AM, Paul Brook wrote:
- What level of testing is appropriate? As a maintainer when can/should I
bounce a patch due to lack of tests?
Yes.
Note the "when". :)
I read "should".
I
On 01/09/2012 06:04 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm going to apply this series quickly and will start running 'make
> check-quick' as part a sniff test before pushing patches.
>
> I'd like to request that all maintainers/submaintainers do the same
> and that everyone contributes unit tests
On 01/09/2012 11:47 AM, Paul Brook wrote:
I'm going to apply this series quickly and will start running 'make
check-quick' as part a sniff test before pushing patches.
I'd like to request that all maintainers/submaintainers do the same and
that everyone contributes unit tests to this target.
Th
On 01/09/2012 10:16 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 01/09/2012 06:04 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Hi,
I'm going to apply this series quickly and will start running 'make
check-quick' as part a sniff test before pushing patches.
I'd like to request that all maintainers/submaintainers do the same
and tha
Hi Anthony,
On Monday, January 09, 2012 05:04:38 PM Anthony Liguori wrote:
[...]
> It would also be nice to get this integrated as part of buildbot.
> Stefan/Daniel, is that something we can do?
Sure, that is pretty easy modification for the current buildbot environment we
just need to add:
f_
> I'm going to apply this series quickly and will start running 'make
> check-quick' as part a sniff test before pushing patches.
>
> I'd like to request that all maintainers/submaintainers do the same and
> that everyone contributes unit tests to this target.
>
> The general rules for 'make chec
16 matches
Mail list logo
