Hello.
Am 01.11.2011 10:37, schrieb Gerd Hoffmann:
I think the main issue here is that we don't do buffering / pipelining
for bulk transfers at the moment. We grab a single transfer request
from the guest, pass it to the kernel, when it is done pass it back to
the guest, then look look for the
Hi.
Am 01.11.2011 10:37, schrieb Gerd Hoffmann:
I think the main issue here is that we don't do buffering / pipelining
for bulk transfers at the moment. We grab a single transfer request
from the guest, pass it to the kernel, when it is done pass it back to
the guest, then look look for the nex
Hi,
> This means that the likely cause is just that usb emulation / pass
> through causes quite a bit of overhead, which is not unexpected since
> both the usb protocol and the ehci controller interface are both quite
> hard to emulate.
I think the main issue here is that we don't do buffering
Hi,
On 10/31/2011 02:37 PM, Til Obes wrote:
Hi.
Am 31.10.2011 13:46, schrieb Hans de Goede:
If you're using libvirt to start qemu, then it will also pass
-usb to qemu, so you will have both a usb-1 (uhci) and a usb-2
(ehci) controller inside your vm, since your hostdev xml code does
not specif
Hi.
Am 31.10.2011 13:46, schrieb Hans de Goede:
If you're using libvirt to start qemu, then it will also pass
-usb to qemu, so you will have both a usb-1 (uhci) and a usb-2
(ehci) controller inside your vm, since your hostdev xml code does
not specify a bus the hostdev will likely get connected
Hi,
On 10/31/2011 10:27 AM, Til Obes wrote:
Hello all,
i want to use a virtual router which is connected to a cable box
via an usb ethernet controller. The device itself runs properly
at normal usage. But inside the virtual machine i get only about 7MBit.
I configured the the usb device with th
