Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for Tuesda, August 28th

2012-08-28 Thread Anthony Liguori
Eduardo Habkost writes: > On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 02:15:30PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: >> Eduardo Habkost writes: >> >> > On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 07:59:47PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote: >> >> Am 28.08.2012 16:27, schrieb Eduardo Habkost: >> >> > On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 02:55:56PM +0100, Pet

Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for Tuesda, August 28th

2012-08-28 Thread Eduardo Habkost
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 02:15:30PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: > Eduardo Habkost writes: > > > On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 07:59:47PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote: > >> Am 28.08.2012 16:27, schrieb Eduardo Habkost: > >> > On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 02:55:56PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > >> >> On 28 A

Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for Tuesda, August 28th

2012-08-28 Thread Anthony Liguori
Eduardo Habkost writes: > On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 07:59:47PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote: >> Am 28.08.2012 16:27, schrieb Eduardo Habkost: >> > On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 02:55:56PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: >> >> On 28 August 2012 14:30, Eduardo Habkost wrote: >> >>> - 1.2 branching, or creation

Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for Tuesda, August 28th

2012-08-28 Thread Eduardo Habkost
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 07:59:47PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote: > Am 28.08.2012 16:27, schrieb Eduardo Habkost: > > On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 02:55:56PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > >> On 28 August 2012 14:30, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > >>> - 1.2 branching, or creation of a "cpu-next" tree where "goo

Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for Tuesda, August 28th

2012-08-28 Thread Andreas Färber
Am 28.08.2012 16:27, schrieb Eduardo Habkost: > On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 02:55:56PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: >> On 28 August 2012 14:30, Eduardo Habkost wrote: >>> - 1.2 branching, or creation of a "cpu-next" tree where "good to be >>> merged" patches can live until 1.2 is done; >> >> With 1.3

Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for Tuesda, August 28th

2012-08-28 Thread Eduardo Habkost
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 02:55:56PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 28 August 2012 14:30, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > > - 1.2 branching, or creation of a "cpu-next" tree where "good to be > > merged" patches can live until 1.2 is done; > > With 1.3 due for release in just over a week, it seems unl

Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for Tuesda, August 28th

2012-08-28 Thread Peter Maydell
On 28 August 2012 14:30, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > - 1.2 branching, or creation of a "cpu-next" tree where "good to be > merged" patches can live until 1.2 is done; With 1.3 due for release in just over a week, it seems unlikely that it's worth branching at this point... -- PMM

Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for Tuesda, August 28th

2012-08-28 Thread Eduardo Habkost
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 03:43:17PM +0200, Juan Quintela wrote: > Eduardo Habkost wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 12:54:54AM +0200, Juan Quintela wrote: > >> > >> Hi > >> > >> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. > > > > - *-user and qdev (recent RFCs didn't get many

Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for Tuesda, August 28th

2012-08-28 Thread Juan Quintela
Eduardo Habkost wrote: > On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 12:54:54AM +0200, Juan Quintela wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. > > - *-user and qdev (recent RFCs didn't get many comments in the list, and > I don't see a conclusion); > - 1.2 branching, or

Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for Tuesda, August 28th

2012-08-28 Thread Eduardo Habkost
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 12:54:54AM +0200, Juan Quintela wrote: > > Hi > > Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. - *-user and qdev (recent RFCs didn't get many comments in the list, and I don't see a conclusion); - 1.2 branching, or creation of a "cpu-next" tree where