On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 10:53:07AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 25/09/2013 10:59, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
> >> > I couldn't find on PCIe spec any mention that "Root Complex Integrated
> >> > EndPoint"
> >> > must be PCIe. But, from spec 1.3.2.3:
> >> > - A Root Complex Integrated Endpoi
Il 25/09/2013 10:59, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
>> > I couldn't find on PCIe spec any mention that "Root Complex Integrated
>> > EndPoint"
>> > must be PCIe. But, from spec 1.3.2.3:
>> > - A Root Complex Integrated Endpoint must not require I/O resources
>> > claimed through BAR(s).
>> > - A
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 06:01:02AM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
> When I added support for the Q35-based machinetypes to libvirt, I
> specifically prohibited attaching any PCI devices (with the exception of
> graphics controllers) to the PCIe root complex, and had planned to
> prevent attaching them t
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 06:01:17PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Yes but, same as in the initial design,
> > it really makes it user's problem.
> >
> > So we'd have
> > virtio-net-pci-conventional
> > virtio-net-pci-express
> > virtio-net-pci-integrated
> >
> >
> > All this while us
Hi,
> Yes but, same as in the initial design,
> it really makes it user's problem.
>
> So we'd have
> virtio-net-pci-conventional
> virtio-net-pci-express
> virtio-net-pci-integrated
>
>
> All this while users just really want to say "virtio"
> (that's the expert user, what most people want i
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 11:55:47AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" writes:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 07:06:44PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >> Marcel Apfelbaum writes:
> >>
> >> > On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 10:01 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >> >> On Tue, Sep 2
On 09/30/2013 05:55 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" writes:
>> I never heard of a pci/pci express
>> one but it's not impossible I think.
> PCI on one side of the card, PCIe on the other, and a switchable
> backplate? Weird :)
>
> Again, I can't see why we'd want to model this
"Michael S. Tsirkin" writes:
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 07:06:44PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Marcel Apfelbaum writes:
>>
>> > On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 10:01 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 06:01:02AM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
>> >> > When I added support for
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 07:06:44PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Marcel Apfelbaum writes:
>
> > On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 10:01 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 06:01:02AM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
> >> > When I added support for the Q35-based machinetypes to libvirt,
Marcel Apfelbaum writes:
> On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 10:01 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 06:01:02AM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
>> > When I added support for the Q35-based machinetypes to libvirt, I
>> > specifically prohibited attaching any PCI devices (with the exception
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 01:56:20PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 06:14:27AM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
> > On 09/25/2013 06:00 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 05:39:37AM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
> > >> However it is done, each controller will
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 06:14:27AM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
> On 09/25/2013 06:00 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 05:39:37AM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
> >> However it is done, each controller will need to have two sets of flags
> >> - one for what it can plug into, and on
On 09/25/2013 06:00 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 05:39:37AM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
>> However it is done, each controller will need to have two sets of flags
>> - one for what it can plug into, and one for what can be plugged into it.
> Not just into it - what can be p
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 05:39:37AM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
> On 09/25/2013 04:48 AM, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 10:01 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 06:01:02AM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
> >>> When I added support for the Q35-based machinetypes
On 09/25/2013 04:48 AM, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 10:01 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 06:01:02AM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
>>> When I added support for the Q35-based machinetypes to libvirt, I
>>> specifically prohibited attaching any PCI devices
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 11:48:28AM +0300, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 10:01 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 06:01:02AM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
> > > When I added support for the Q35-based machinetypes to libvirt, I
> > > specifically prohibited att
On Wed, 2013-09-25 at 10:01 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 06:01:02AM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
> > When I added support for the Q35-based machinetypes to libvirt, I
> > specifically prohibited attaching any PCI devices (with the exception of
> > graphics controllers) to
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 06:01:02AM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
> When I added support for the Q35-based machinetypes to libvirt, I
> specifically prohibited attaching any PCI devices (with the exception of
> graphics controllers) to the PCIe root complex,
That's wrong I think. Anything attached to R
18 matches
Mail list logo
