Il 23/01/2014 17:23, Wei Liu ha scritto:
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 01:54:40PM +, Wei Liu wrote:
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 10:11:57AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 22/01/2014 17:09, Wei Liu ha scritto:
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 11:20:38AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 21/01/2014 19:27, Wei Liu
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 01:54:40PM +, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 10:11:57AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > Il 22/01/2014 17:09, Wei Liu ha scritto:
> > >On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 11:20:38AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > >>Il 21/01/2014 19:27, Wei Liu ha scritto:
> > >
> > >>>
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 10:11:57AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 22/01/2014 17:09, Wei Liu ha scritto:
> >On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 11:20:38AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >>Il 21/01/2014 19:27, Wei Liu ha scritto:
> >
> >Googling "disable tcg" would have provided an answer, but the patch
Il 22/01/2014 17:09, Wei Liu ha scritto:
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 11:20:38AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 21/01/2014 19:27, Wei Liu ha scritto:
Googling "disable tcg" would have provided an answer, but the patches
were old enough to be basically useless. I'll refresh the current
version in t
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 11:20:38AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 21/01/2014 19:27, Wei Liu ha scritto:
> >>>
> >>> Googling "disable tcg" would have provided an answer, but the patches
> >>> were old enough to be basically useless. I'll refresh the current
> >>> version in the next few days. C
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 11:20:38AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 21/01/2014 19:27, Wei Liu ha scritto:
> >>>
> >>> Googling "disable tcg" would have provided an answer, but the patches
> >>> were old enough to be basically useless. I'll refresh the current
> >>> version in the next few days. C
Il 21/01/2014 19:27, Wei Liu ha scritto:
>
> Googling "disable tcg" would have provided an answer, but the patches
> were old enough to be basically useless. I'll refresh the current
> version in the next few days. Currently I am (or try to be) on
> vacation, so I cannot really say when, but I'
On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 02:32:38PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 07/01/2014 13:34, Wei Liu ha scritto:
> > On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 09:53:37PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >> Il 06/01/2014 19:00, Andreas Färber ha scritto:
> >>> Am 06.01.2014 16:39, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> We already hav
On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 02:32:38PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 07/01/2014 13:34, Wei Liu ha scritto:
> > On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 09:53:37PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >> Il 06/01/2014 19:00, Andreas Färber ha scritto:
> >>> Am 06.01.2014 16:39, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> We already hav
Il 07/01/2014 13:34, Wei Liu ha scritto:
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 09:53:37PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 06/01/2014 19:00, Andreas Färber ha scritto:
>>> Am 06.01.2014 16:39, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
We already have accel=xen. I'm echoing Peter's suggestion of having the
ability t
On Mon, 6 Jan 2014, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 07:12:07PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
> > Am 06.01.2014 16:12, schrieb Wei Liu:
> > > On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 01:30:20PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > >> On 6 January 2014 12:54, Wei Liu wrote:
> > >>> In fact I've already hacked a p
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 09:53:37PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 06/01/2014 19:00, Andreas Färber ha scritto:
> > Am 06.01.2014 16:39, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> >> We already have accel=xen. I'm echoing Peter's suggestion of having the
> >> ability to compile out accel=tcg.
> >
> > Didn't you
Il 06/01/2014 16:04, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
> On 6 January 2014 14:54, Stefano Stabellini
> wrote:
>> How would you avoid the compilation of all the
>> unnecessary emulated devices?
>
> Didn't we have some patches for doing a Kconfig-style
> "select the devices you need" build recently?
It wa
Il 06/01/2014 19:00, Andreas Färber ha scritto:
> Am 06.01.2014 16:39, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
>> We already have accel=xen. I'm echoing Peter's suggestion of having the
>> ability to compile out accel=tcg.
>
> Didn't you and Paolo even have patches for that a while ago?
Yes, but some code shuf
On Mon, 6 Jan 2014, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 7:57 AM, Stefano Stabellini
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 6 Jan 2014, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >> On Jan 6, 2014 6:55 AM, "Stefano Stabellini"
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, 6 Jan 2014, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >> > > On Jan 6, 2014 6
Am 06.01.2014 16:39, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> We already have accel=xen. I'm echoing Peter's suggestion of having the
> ability to compile out accel=tcg.
Didn't you and Paolo even have patches for that a while ago?
Cheers,
Andreas
--
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, G
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 7:57 AM, Stefano Stabellini
wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Jan 2014, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> On Jan 6, 2014 6:55 AM, "Stefano Stabellini"
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Mon, 6 Jan 2014, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> > > On Jan 6, 2014 6:23 AM, "Peter Maydell" wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > On 6 Janu
On Mon, 6 Jan 2014, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On Jan 6, 2014 6:55 AM, "Stefano Stabellini"
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 6 Jan 2014, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > > On Jan 6, 2014 6:23 AM, "Peter Maydell" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 6 January 2014 14:17, Stefano Stabellini
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > It does
On Jan 6, 2014 6:55 AM, "Stefano Stabellini" <
stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 6 Jan 2014, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > On Jan 6, 2014 6:23 AM, "Peter Maydell"
wrote:
> > >
> > > On 6 January 2014 14:17, Stefano Stabellini
> > > wrote:
> > > > It doesn't do any emulation so it
On 6 January 2014 14:54, Stefano Stabellini
wrote:
> How would you avoid the compilation of all the
> unnecessary emulated devices?
Didn't we have some patches for doing a Kconfig-style
"select the devices you need" build recently?
-- PMM
On Mon, 6 Jan 2014, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On Jan 6, 2014 6:23 AM, "Peter Maydell" wrote:
> >
> > On 6 January 2014 14:17, Stefano Stabellini
> > wrote:
> > > It doesn't do any emulation so it is not specific to any architecture or
> > > any cpu.
> >
> > You presumably still care about the comp
On Jan 6, 2014 6:23 AM, "Peter Maydell" wrote:
>
> On 6 January 2014 14:17, Stefano Stabellini
> wrote:
> > It doesn't do any emulation so it is not specific to any architecture or
> > any cpu.
>
> You presumably still care about the compiled in values of
> TARGET_WORDS_BIGENDIAN, TARGET_LONG_SIZ
On 6 January 2014 14:17, Stefano Stabellini
wrote:
> It doesn't do any emulation so it is not specific to any architecture or
> any cpu.
You presumably still care about the compiled in values of
TARGET_WORDS_BIGENDIAN, TARGET_LONG_SIZE, and so on...
thanks
-- PMM
On Mon, 6 Jan 2014, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 12:54 +, Wei Liu wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> > This idea is to modify QEMU's Makefiles, plus implementing some stubs to
> > make it possible to tailor QEMU to a smaller binary.
> >
> > The current setup for Xen on X86 is to build
On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 12:54 +, Wei Liu wrote:
> Hi all
>
> This idea is to modify QEMU's Makefiles, plus implementing some stubs to
> make it possible to tailor QEMU to a smaller binary.
>
> The current setup for Xen on X86 is to build i386-softmmu, and uses this
> single binary for two purpo
25 matches
Mail list logo
