On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 08:05:58PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 04.03.2016 07:54, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> > From: Gu Zheng
> >
> > In order to deal well with the kvm vcpus (which can not be removed without
> > any
> > protection), we do not close KVM vcpu fd, just record and mark it as stopped
On 04.03.2016 07:54, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> From: Gu Zheng
>
> In order to deal well with the kvm vcpus (which can not be removed without any
> protection), we do not close KVM vcpu fd, just record and mark it as stopped
> into a list, so that we can reuse it for the appending cpu hot-add request
