On 27.06.2016 18:38, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 27.06.2016 um 18:13 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
>> I'm not sure if WCE truly is a guest device property, but adding it as a
>> guest device property and then syncing it to the BB makes sense (as done
>> in patch 7).
>
> It is truly a guest device property
Am 27.06.2016 um 18:13 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
> I'm not sure if WCE truly is a guest device property, but adding it as a
> guest device property and then syncing it to the BB makes sense (as done
> in patch 7).
It is truly a guest device property. Physical hardware can have a
volatile write ca
On 23.06.2016 16:36, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> I am relatively confident to say that everything that should use a
> BlockBackend, does so by now. Almost all users create their own anonymous
> BlockBackend internally and use that. The user configures the BB only
> indirectly using the configuration method
On 23/06/2016 16:36, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> But of course I'm aware that there probably isn't a clear right or wrong, and
> that I might be missing important details, so this needs to be discussed in
> advance before I go and implement the full thing instead of just small example
> patches.
>
> So
