On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 12:39:36PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 20.04.2012 06:16, schrieb David Gibson:
> > I'm really hoping I can get some extra review of this code path. I
> > believe it's correct, but it's not straightforward to test, since it
> > will not be exercise by correct guest softwar
Am 20.04.2012 06:16, schrieb David Gibson:
> I'm really hoping I can get some extra review of this code path. I
> believe it's correct, but it's not straightforward to test, since it
> will not be exercise by correct guest software.
Sounds like a good case for qtest. Did you consider that?
Kevin
