Thanks for all your comments. I'm going to write a simple demo to go
through the whole workflow first, and then adjust the policies following
the conclusions of our discussion.
Heyi
On 2019/7/16 16:47, Dave Martin wrote:
On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 03:44:46PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
On Mon,
On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 03:44:46PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 03:26:39PM +0100, James Morse wrote:
> > On 15/07/2019 14:48, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 02:41:00PM +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
> > >> One option (suggested to me by James Morse) would be to
On 16/07/2019 09:30, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 02:48:49PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 02:41:00PM +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>> So long as KVM_EXIT_HYPERCALL reports sufficient information so that
>>> userspace can identify the cause as an S
On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 02:48:49PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 02:41:00PM +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
[...]
> > So long as KVM_EXIT_HYPERCALL reports sufficient information so that
> > userspace can identify the cause as an SMC and retrieve the SMC
> > immediate field, this
On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 03:26:39PM +0100, James Morse wrote:
> On 15/07/2019 14:48, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 02:41:00PM +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
> >> One option (suggested to me by James Morse) would be to allow userspace
> >> to disable in the in-kernel PSCI implementation
Hi guys,
On 15/07/2019 14:48, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 02:41:00PM +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 13, 2019 at 05:53:57PM +0800, Guoheyi wrote:
>>> Do it make sense to implement virtual SDEI in qemu? So that we can have the
>>> standard way for guest to handle NMI watc
On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 02:41:00PM +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 13, 2019 at 05:53:57PM +0800, Guoheyi wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > Do it make sense to implement virtual SDEI in qemu? So that we can have the
> > standard way for guest to handle NMI watchdog, RAS events and something else
On Sat, Jul 13, 2019 at 05:53:57PM +0800, Guoheyi wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Do it make sense to implement virtual SDEI in qemu? So that we can have the
> standard way for guest to handle NMI watchdog, RAS events and something else
> which involves SDEI in a physical ARM64 machine.
>
> My basic idea
