On 2011-10-17 16:28, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 01:27:31PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2011-10-17 13:22, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 11:28:16AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Devices models are usually not interested in specifying MSI-X
conf
On 2011-10-18 12:52, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 09:21:34PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2011-10-17 16:28, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 01:27:31PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-10-17 13:22, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 20
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 09:21:34PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-10-17 16:28, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 01:27:31PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> On 2011-10-17 13:22, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 11:28:16AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> D
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 01:27:31PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-10-17 13:22, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 11:28:16AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> Devices models are usually not interested in specifying MSI-X
> >> configuration details beyond the number of vectors to
On 2011-10-17 13:22, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 11:28:16AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Devices models are usually not interested in specifying MSI-X
>> configuration details beyond the number of vectors to provide and the
>> BAR number to use. Layout of an exclusively used
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 11:28:16AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Devices models are usually not interested in specifying MSI-X
> configuration details beyond the number of vectors to provide and the
> BAR number to use. Layout of an exclusively used BAR and its
> registration can also be handled centr
