On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 11:11:55AM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
>On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 10:46:37AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 09:59:10AM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
>> >On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 09:29:02AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
>> >> The value left in nr is the number of bits for the la
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 10:46:37AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 09:59:10AM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> >On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 09:29:02AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
> >> The value left in nr is the number of bits for the last word, which
> >> could be calculate the last word mask dire
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 09:59:10AM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
>On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 09:29:02AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
>> The value left in nr is the number of bits for the last word, which
>> could be calculate the last word mask directly.
>
>Is it true even if start does not align to BITS_PER_LONG?
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 09:29:02AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
> The value left in nr is the number of bits for the last word, which
> could be calculate the last word mask directly.
Is it true even if start does not align to BITS_PER_LONG?
>
> Remove the unnecessary size.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yan