>
>
>
> >
> > I already spent 2h on this today, I have to continue other tasks
> > meanwhile, I might continue later.
>
> I spent 1 more hour installing the CodeScape MIPS SDK,...
Philippe, thank you so much for your 3 hours!
Regards,
Aleksandar
Hi Aleksandar,
On 7/18/19 8:20 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 7/16/19 8:20 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> Hi Aleksandar,
>>
>> On 7/16/19 7:09 PM, Aleksandar Markovic wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 1:54 PM Thomas Huth wrote:
On 16/07/2019 13.17, Aleksandar Markovic wro
On 7/16/19 8:20 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Hi Aleksandar,
>
> On 7/16/19 7:09 PM, Aleksandar Markovic wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 1:54 PM Thomas Huth wrote:
>>>
>>> On 16/07/2019 13.17, Aleksandar Markovic wrote:
Hello, Gerd, Daniel, and others involved.
I have multi
On 7/17/19 2:20 PM, Aleksandar Markovic wrote:
> But, does "configure" list somewhere unmet soft dependencies? (the
> question is general, not looking at SDL only) Is there any other way for
> an end user to have info on unmet dependencies (whether soft or hard),
> other than see QEMU is not build
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 8:57 PM Eric Blake wrote:
>
> On 7/17/19 1:34 PM, Aleksandar Markovic wrote:
>
> >
> > Daniel, that is fine, I don't question that, I basically wanted to start a
> > talk
> > between us to clarify some things. Related to our situation in the field,
> > I have a sub-questio
On 7/17/19 1:34 PM, Aleksandar Markovic wrote:
>
> Daniel, that is fine, I don't question that, I basically wanted to start a
> talk
> between us to clarify some things. Related to our situation in the field,
> I have a sub-question to you:
>
> Let's say there is a build system with SDL 1.2, an
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 7:44 PM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 07:09:37PM +0200, Aleksandar Markovic wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 1:54 PM Thomas Huth wrote:
> > >
> > > On 16/07/2019 13.17, Aleksandar Markovic wrote:
> > > > Hello, Gerd, Daniel, and others involved.
>
On Tue, 16 Jul 2019 at 18:48, Aleksandar Markovic
wrote:
> "For distributions with frequent, short-lifetime releases, the project will
> aim to support all versions that are not end of life by their respective
> vendors. For the purposes of identifying supported software versions,
> the project wi
Hi Aleksandar,
On 7/16/19 7:09 PM, Aleksandar Markovic wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 1:54 PM Thomas Huth wrote:
>>
>> On 16/07/2019 13.17, Aleksandar Markovic wrote:
>>> Hello, Gerd, Daniel, and others involved.
>>>
>>> I have multiple reports from end users that say that transition from
>>> S
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 08:06:24PM +0200, Aleksandar Markovic wrote:
> > > It appears that Ubuntu 16.04 came originally with SDL 1.2, and
> > > SDL 2.0 was made available later on.
> >
> > That is not the case. Ubuntu has shipped both SDL 1.2 and 2.0
> > concurrently as options, even in the previou
> > It appears that Ubuntu 16.04 came originally with SDL 1.2, and
> > SDL 2.0 was made available later on.
>
> That is not the case. Ubuntu has shipped both SDL 1.2 and 2.0
> concurrently as options, even in the previous 14.04 LTS, and
> probably before that too.
>
Thank you for finding this out.
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 1:41 PM Peter Maydell wrote:
>
> On Tue, 16 Jul 2019 at 12:17, Aleksandar Markovic
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello, Gerd, Daniel, and others involved.
> >
> > I have multiple reports from end users that say that transition from
> > SDL 1.2 to SDL 2.0 was difficult, or even impossib
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 07:09:37PM +0200, Aleksandar Markovic wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 1:54 PM Thomas Huth wrote:
> >
> > On 16/07/2019 13.17, Aleksandar Markovic wrote:
> > > Hello, Gerd, Daniel, and others involved.
> > >
> > > I have multiple reports from end users that say that transit
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 1:54 PM Thomas Huth wrote:
>
> On 16/07/2019 13.17, Aleksandar Markovic wrote:
> > Hello, Gerd, Daniel, and others involved.
> >
> > I have multiple reports from end users that say that transition from
> > SDL 1.2 to SDL 2.0 was difficult, or even impossible for their hosts
On 16/07/2019 13.17, Aleksandar Markovic wrote:
> Hello, Gerd, Daniel, and others involved.
>
> I have multiple reports from end users that say that transition from
> SDL 1.2 to SDL 2.0 was difficult, or even impossible for their hosts.
> In that light, they don't appreciate removing SDL 1.2 suppo
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 01:17:01PM +0200, Aleksandar Markovic wrote:
> Hello, Gerd, Daniel, and others involved.
>
> I have multiple reports from end users that say that transition from
> SDL 1.2 to SDL 2.0 was difficult, or even impossible for their hosts.
> In that light, they don't appreciate r
On Tue, 16 Jul 2019 at 12:17, Aleksandar Markovic
wrote:
>
> Hello, Gerd, Daniel, and others involved.
>
> I have multiple reports from end users that say that transition from
> SDL 1.2 to SDL 2.0 was difficult, or even impossible for their hosts.
> In that light, they don't appreciate removing SD
17 matches
Mail list logo
