On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 16:20:24 +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
(snip)
> Hi -- Coverity points out in CID1395181 that this introduces
> a memory leak -- we allocate memory into the rev pointer
> with g_renew(), but we never free it before leaving the function.
Thanks for the heads up; fix forthcoming
On 21 August 2018 at 18:02, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> From: "Emilio G. Cota"
>
> This paves the way for implementing the CPU list with an RCU list,
> which cannot be traversed in reverse order.
>
> Note that this is the only caller of CPU_FOREACH_REVERSE.
>
> Acked-by: David Gibson
> Signed-off-by:
