On Thu, 01/29 09:29, Max Reitz wrote:
> Would it be possible to just remove {b,io}ps_max completely from this test?
> I'd be fine with that.
Sure, will resend.
Fam
>
> Max
On 2015-01-28 at 21:06, Fam Zheng wrote:
On Thu, 01/29 08:53, Fam Zheng wrote:
On Wed, 01/28 11:22, Max Reitz wrote:
On 2015-01-27 at 21:28, Fam Zheng wrote:
This case utilizes qemu-io command "aio_{read,write} -q" to verify the
effectiveness of IO throttling options.
It's implemented by driv
On Thu, 01/29 08:53, Fam Zheng wrote:
> On Wed, 01/28 11:22, Max Reitz wrote:
> > On 2015-01-27 at 21:28, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > >This case utilizes qemu-io command "aio_{read,write} -q" to verify the
> > >effectiveness of IO throttling options.
> > >
> > >It's implemented by driving the vm timer fro
On Wed, 01/28 11:22, Max Reitz wrote:
> On 2015-01-27 at 21:28, Fam Zheng wrote:
> >This case utilizes qemu-io command "aio_{read,write} -q" to verify the
> >effectiveness of IO throttling options.
> >
> >It's implemented by driving the vm timer from qtest protocol, so the
> >throttling timers are
On 2015-01-27 at 21:28, Fam Zheng wrote:
This case utilizes qemu-io command "aio_{read,write} -q" to verify the
effectiveness of IO throttling options.
It's implemented by driving the vm timer from qtest protocol, so the
throttling timers are signaled with determinied time duration. Then we
veri
