On 01/02/2018 10:42 AM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> Le 02/01/2018 à 17:50, Richard Henderson a écrit :
>> On 01/01/2018 05:10 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>>> +mode = (insn >> 3) & 7;
>>> +
>>> +if (mode & 4) {
>>
>> Looks like mode should equal 4 as well.
>>
>
> Yes, you're right. I will replace
Le 03/01/2018 à 00:49, Richard Henderson a écrit :
> On 01/02/2018 10:42 AM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>> Le 02/01/2018 à 17:50, Richard Henderson a écrit :
>>> On 01/01/2018 05:10 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
+mode = (insn >> 3) & 7;
+
+if (mode & 4) {
>>>
>>> Looks like mode shoul
Le 02/01/2018 à 17:50, Richard Henderson a écrit :
> On 01/01/2018 05:10 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>> +mode = (insn >> 3) & 7;
>> +
>> +if (mode & 4) {
>
> Looks like mode should equal 4 as well.
>
Yes, you're right. I will replace the line by:
+if (mode == 4) {
Thanks,
Laurent
On 01/01/2018 05:10 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> +mode = (insn >> 3) & 7;
> +
> +if (mode & 4) {
Looks like mode should equal 4 as well.
r~
