On 08/28/2013 09:01 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 08/28/2013 08:49 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Am 28.08.2013 12:37, schrieb Alexey Kardashevskiy:
>>> IBM POWERPC processors encode PVR as a CPU family in higher 16 bits and
>>> a CPU version in lower 16 bits. Since there is no significant cha
On Thu, 2013-08-29 at 14:52 +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> We are going to need a way to do that for pseries guests. So for
> example if we are running on a POWER8 machine and using KVM, we would
> want to be able to tell qemu that we want a POWER7 machine and have
> qemu put 0x0f03 in the dev
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 01:33:07PM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:49:27PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
>
> > According to the only reply I received, it's "POWER7", not "POWER7+" -
> > see my patch description. If that information was wrong, we'll need to
> > move POWER7P
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:49:27PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> According to the only reply I received, it's "POWER7", not "POWER7+" -
> see my patch description. If that information was wrong, we'll need to
> move POWER7P introduction before my fw_name patch and update it accordingly.
It shoul
On 08/28/2013 08:49 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 28.08.2013 12:37, schrieb Alexey Kardashevskiy:
>> IBM POWERPC processors encode PVR as a CPU family in higher 16 bits and
>> a CPU version in lower 16 bits. Since there is no significant change
>> in behavior between versions, there is no point to
Am 28.08.2013 12:37, schrieb Alexey Kardashevskiy:
> IBM POWERPC processors encode PVR as a CPU family in higher 16 bits and
> a CPU version in lower 16 bits. Since there is no significant change
> in behavior between versions, there is no point to add every single CPU
> version in QEMU's CPU list.
