Am 07.07.2017 um 04:55 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
> On 07/06/2017 11:02 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>
> >> +++ b/qemu-img.c
> >> @@ -3229,6 +3229,7 @@ static int img_rebase(int argc, char **argv)
> >> int64_t new_backing_num_sectors = 0;
> >> uint64_t sector;
> >> int n;
> >>
On 07/06/2017 11:02 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> +++ b/qemu-img.c
>> @@ -3229,6 +3229,7 @@ static int img_rebase(int argc, char **argv)
>> int64_t new_backing_num_sectors = 0;
>> uint64_t sector;
>> int n;
>> +int64_t count;
>> float local_progress = 0;
>>
>
On 07/06/2017 11:02 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 05.07.2017 um 23:08 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
>> We are gradually moving away from sector-based interfaces, towards
>> byte-based. In the common case, allocation is unlikely to ever use
>> values that are not naturally sector-aligned, but it is poss
Am 05.07.2017 um 23:08 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
> We are gradually moving away from sector-based interfaces, towards
> byte-based. In the common case, allocation is unlikely to ever use
> values that are not naturally sector-aligned, but it is possible
> that byte-based values will let us be mo