On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 11:12:45AM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> On 12/06/2016 10:20 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 09:06:17PM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> >> On 12/01/2016 08:26 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> >>> This patch is based on the algorithm for the k
On 12/06/2016 10:20 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 09:06:17PM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>> On 12/01/2016 08:26 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>> This patch is based on the algorithm for the kvm.ko halt_poll_ns
>>> parameter in Linux. The initial polling time is zero.
>
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 09:06:17PM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> On 12/01/2016 08:26 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > This patch is based on the algorithm for the kvm.ko halt_poll_ns
> > parameter in Linux. The initial polling time is zero.
> >
> > If the event loop is woken up within the m
On 12/01/2016 08:26 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> This patch is based on the algorithm for the kvm.ko halt_poll_ns
> parameter in Linux. The initial polling time is zero.
>
> If the event loop is woken up within the maximum polling time it means
> polling could be effective, so grow polling time.