Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 1/3] 9pfs: forbid illegal path names

2016-08-30 Thread Aneesh Kumar K.V
Eric Blake writes: > [ Unknown signature status ] > On 08/30/2016 12:11 PM, Greg Kurz wrote: >> Empty path components don't make sense for most commands and may cause >> undefined behavior, depending on the backend. >> >> Also, the walk request described in the 9P spec [1] clearly shows that >>

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 1/3] 9pfs: forbid illegal path names

2016-08-30 Thread Greg Kurz
On Tue, 30 Aug 2016 13:03:40 -0500 Eric Blake wrote: > On 08/30/2016 12:11 PM, Greg Kurz wrote: > > Empty path components don't make sense for most commands and may cause > > undefined behavior, depending on the backend. > > > > Also, the walk request described in the 9P spec [1] clearly shows t

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 1/3] 9pfs: forbid illegal path names

2016-08-30 Thread Eric Blake
On 08/30/2016 12:11 PM, Greg Kurz wrote: > Empty path components don't make sense for most commands and may cause > undefined behavior, depending on the backend. > > Also, the walk request described in the 9P spec [1] clearly shows that > the client is supposed to send individual path components: