On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 4:05 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 22:15:55 +0800
> Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> > Il 09/06/2012 05:04, Zhi Yong Wu ha scritto:
>> > This commit looks suspicious because it removes a user-visible q
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 08:28:57AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 09/06/2012 05:04, Zhi Yong Wu ha scritto:
>
On 06/11/2012 01:28 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 09/06/2012 05:04, Zhi Yong Wu ha scritto:
This commit looks suspicious because it removes a user-visible qdev
property but we're trying to preserve backward compatibility. This
command-line will break:
x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 -net user,
On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 22:15:55 +0800
Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > Il 09/06/2012 05:04, Zhi Yong Wu ha scritto:
> > This commit looks suspicious because it removes a user-visible qdev
> > property but we're trying to preserve backward compat
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 08:28:57AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> Il 09/06/2012 05:04, Zhi Yong Wu ha scritto:
>>> This commit looks suspicious because it removes a user-visibl
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi
wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 08:28:57AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 09/06/2012 05:04, Zhi Yong Wu ha scritto:
>> This commit looks suspicious because it removes a user-visible qdev
>> property but we're trying to preserve backwar
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 09/06/2012 05:04, Zhi Yong Wu ha scritto:
> This commit looks suspicious because it removes a user-visible qdev
> property but we're trying to preserve backward compatibility. This
> command-line will break:
>
> x86_64
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 08:28:57AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 09/06/2012 05:04, Zhi Yong Wu ha scritto:
> This commit looks suspicious because it removes a user-visible qdev
> property but we're trying to preserve backward compatibility. This
> command-line will break:
>
Il 09/06/2012 05:04, Zhi Yong Wu ha scritto:
This commit looks suspicious because it removes a user-visible qdev
property but we're trying to preserve backward compatibility. This
command-line will break:
x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 -net user,vlan=1 -device
vir
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 12:09 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 9:23 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 6:29 AM, wrote:
From: Stefan Hajnoczi
The vlan feature is implemented using hubs and
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Zhi Yong Wu wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 9:23 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 6:29 AM, wrote:
>>> From: Stefan Hajnoczi
>>>
>>> The vlan feature is implemented using hubs and no longer uses
>>> special-purpose VLANState structs that are a
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 9:23 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 6:29 AM, wrote:
>> From: Stefan Hajnoczi
>>
>> The vlan feature is implemented using hubs and no longer uses
>> special-purpose VLANState structs that are accessible as qdev
>> properties.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stefa
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 6:29 AM, wrote:
> From: Stefan Hajnoczi
>
> The vlan feature is implemented using hubs and no longer uses
> special-purpose VLANState structs that are accessible as qdev
> properties.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi
> Signed-off-by: Zhi Yong Wu
> ---
> hw/qdev-proper
13 matches
Mail list logo
