* Eduardo Habkost (ehabk...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 08:16:06PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) wrote:
> [...]
> > @@ -2084,6 +2085,27 @@ static int kvm_get_msrs(X86CPU *cpu)
> > }
> >
> > assert(ret == cpu->kvm_msr_buf->nmsrs);
> > +/*
> > + * MTRR masks
On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 08:16:06PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) wrote:
[...]
> @@ -2084,6 +2085,27 @@ static int kvm_get_msrs(X86CPU *cpu)
> }
>
> assert(ret == cpu->kvm_msr_buf->nmsrs);
> +/*
> + * MTRR masks: Each mask consists of 5 parts
> + * a 10..0: must be zer
On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 11:03:59PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 08:16:06PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) wrote:
> > From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert"
> >
> > Fill the bits between 51..number-of-physical-address-bits in the
> > MTRR_PHYSMASKn variable range mtrr ma
On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 08:16:06PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) wrote:
> From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert"
>
> Fill the bits between 51..number-of-physical-address-bits in the
> MTRR_PHYSMASKn variable range mtrr masks so that they're consistent
> in the migration stream irrespective of the p
