Gerd Hoffmann writes:
> Hi,
>
>> OK, so now I've found the bit about the magic 42; commit 7b074a22 of
>> yours; recommended checking for 42 for knowing we had autosuspend;
>> what's actually in the current fedora hid rules is serial!=1 - I wonder
>> what others have.
>
> Whatever upstream syste
* Gerd Hoffmann (kra...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > > And even if it turns out autosuspend is still an issue: I think
> > > meanwhile we can really stop worrying about guests running in old qemu
> > > versions with broken usb suspend (fixed in 0.13 !). If needed we can
> > > enable autosuspend uncondi
> > And even if it turns out autosuspend is still an issue: I think
> > meanwhile we can really stop worrying about guests running in old qemu
> > versions with broken usb suspend (fixed in 0.13 !). If needed we can
> > enable autosuspend unconditionally in guests.
>
> OK, so what about the othe
* Gerd Hoffmann (kra...@redhat.com) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > OK, so now I've found the bit about the magic 42; commit 7b074a22 of
> > yours; recommended checking for 42 for knowing we had autosuspend;
> > what's actually in the current fedora hid rules is serial!=1 - I wonder
> > what others have.
>
Hi,
> OK, so now I've found the bit about the magic 42; commit 7b074a22 of
> yours; recommended checking for 42 for knowing we had autosuspend;
> what's actually in the current fedora hid rules is serial!=1 - I wonder
> what others have.
Whatever upstream systemd/udev has I guess ...
A bit of
* Gerd Hoffmann (kra...@redhat.com) wrote:
> Windows guests have trouble dealing with usb devices having identical
> serial numbers. So, assign unique serial numbers to usb hid devices.
> All other usb devices have this already.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann
> ---
> include/hw/compat.h | 14
