Am 24.06.2013 um 08:13 schrieb Julio Guerra :
> 2013/6/24 Alexey Kardashevskiy :
>> On 06/21/2013 10:03 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>
>>> On 21.06.2013, at 14:01, Julio Guerra wrote:
>>>
2013/6/21 Alexander Graf :
>
> On 26.05.2013, at 19:41, Julio Guerra wrote:
>
>> MPC
2013/6/24 Alexey Kardashevskiy :
> On 06/21/2013 10:03 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>> On 21.06.2013, at 14:01, Julio Guerra wrote:
>>
>>> 2013/6/21 Alexander Graf :
On 26.05.2013, at 19:41, Julio Guerra wrote:
> MPC86xx processors are based on the e600 core, which is not the cas
On 06/21/2013 10:03 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 21.06.2013, at 14:01, Julio Guerra wrote:
>
>> 2013/6/21 Alexander Graf :
>>>
>>> On 26.05.2013, at 19:41, Julio Guerra wrote:
>>>
MPC86xx processors are based on the e600 core, which is not the case
in qemu where it is based on the 7
On 21.06.2013, at 14:01, Julio Guerra wrote:
> 2013/6/21 Alexander Graf :
>>
>> On 26.05.2013, at 19:41, Julio Guerra wrote:
>>
>>> MPC86xx processors are based on the e600 core, which is not the case
>>> in qemu where it is based on the 7400 processor.
>>>
>>> This patch creates the e600 core
2013/6/21 Alexander Graf :
>
> On 26.05.2013, at 19:41, Julio Guerra wrote:
>
>> MPC86xx processors are based on the e600 core, which is not the case
>> in qemu where it is based on the 7400 processor.
>>
>> This patch creates the e600 core and instantiates the MPC86xx
>> processors based on it. Th
On 26.05.2013, at 19:41, Julio Guerra wrote:
> MPC86xx processors are based on the e600 core, which is not the case
> in qemu where it is based on the 7400 processor.
>
> This patch creates the e600 core and instantiates the MPC86xx
> processors based on it. Therefore, adding the high BATs and t
2013/6/7 Julio Guerra :
>>>
>>> However I can't judge whether all that code is right for e600 and
>>> whether you may want to share some code with e500 / e5500 in some way?
>>> CC'ing some Freescale folks.
>>
>>
>> e600 is a very different core from e500/e5500. It is a 74xx derivative.
>> The only
>>
>> However I can't judge whether all that code is right for e600 and
>> whether you may want to share some code with e500 / e5500 in some way?
>> CC'ing some Freescale folks.
>
>
> e600 is a very different core from e500/e5500. It is a 74xx derivative.
> The only thing I can see that could be s
On 06/06/2013 06:44:31 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 26.05.2013 19:41, schrieb Julio Guerra:
> MPC86xx processors are based on the e600 core, which is not the case
> in qemu where it is based on the 7400 processor.
>
> This patch creates the e600 core and instantiates the MPC86xx
> processors base
Am 26.05.2013 19:41, schrieb Julio Guerra:
> MPC86xx processors are based on the e600 core, which is not the case
> in qemu where it is based on the 7400 processor.
>
> This patch creates the e600 core and instantiates the MPC86xx
> processors based on it. Therefore, adding the high BATs and the S
ping
2013/5/26 Julio Guerra :
> MPC86xx processors are based on the e600 core, which is not the case
> in qemu where it is based on the 7400 processor.
>
> This patch creates the e600 core and instantiates the MPC86xx
> processors based on it. Therefore, adding the high BATs and the SPRG
> 4..7 re
11 matches
Mail list logo
