Eric Blake writes:
> On 11/12/2015 08:11 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Eric Blake writes:
>>
>>> None of the visitor callbacks would set an error when testing
>>> if an optional field was present; make this part of the interface
>>> contract by eliminating the errp argument. Then, for less c
On 11/12/2015 08:11 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Eric Blake writes:
>
>> None of the visitor callbacks would set an error when testing
>> if an optional field was present; make this part of the interface
>> contract by eliminating the errp argument. Then, for less code,
>> reflect the determin
Eric Blake writes:
> None of the visitor callbacks would set an error when testing
> if an optional field was present; make this part of the interface
> contract by eliminating the errp argument. Then, for less code,
> reflect the determined boolean value back to the caller instead
> of making t
