On 04/27/2016 10:59 AM, Fam Zheng wrote:
On Wed, 04/27 09:32, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
On 04/26/2016 12:46 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 11:41:51AM +0300, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
The idea is simple - backup is "written-once" data. It is written block
by block and it is large en
Am 27.04.2016 um 09:59 hat Fam Zheng geschrieben:
> On Wed, 04/27 09:32, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> > On 04/26/2016 12:46 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 11:41:51AM +0300, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> > > > The idea is simple - backup is "written-once" data. It is written block
> >
On Wed, 04/27 09:32, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> On 04/26/2016 12:46 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 11:41:51AM +0300, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> > > The idea is simple - backup is "written-once" data. It is written block
> > > by block and it is large enough. It would be nice to sa
On 04/26/2016 12:46 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 11:41:51AM +0300, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
The idea is simple - backup is "written-once" data. It is written block
by block and it is large enough. It would be nice to save storage
space and compress it.
These patches add the a
On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 11:41:51AM +0300, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> The idea is simple - backup is "written-once" data. It is written block
> by block and it is large enough. It would be nice to save storage
> space and compress it.
>
> These patches add the ability to compress data during backup. T
