Il 18/02/2013 17:02, Anthony Liguori ha scritto:
> Applied. Thanks.
Hmm, since this is late for 1.4 patch 2 should be reverted.
Paolo
Paolo Bonzini writes:
> Il 18/02/2013 21:43, Paolo Bonzini ha scritto:
>> Il 18/02/2013 17:02, Anthony Liguori ha scritto:
>>> Applied. Thanks.
>>
>> Hmm, since this is late for 1.4 patch 2 should be reverted.
>
> Oops, it's just the applied message that was late. Sorry for the
> noise.
Yeah,
Il 18/02/2013 21:43, Paolo Bonzini ha scritto:
> Il 18/02/2013 17:02, Anthony Liguori ha scritto:
>> Applied. Thanks.
>
> Hmm, since this is late for 1.4 patch 2 should be reverted.
Oops, it's just the applied message that was late. Sorry for the noise.
Paolo
Applied. Thanks.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
Eric Blake writes:
> On 02/13/2013 07:54 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Why am I proposing these patches for 1.4?
>>
>> PATCH 1/2 is a straightforward doc fix.
>>
>> PATCH 2/2 cleans up a part of QAPI that has never been released,
>> before it's too late. If we're already beyond the point whe
On 02/13/2013 07:54 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Why am I proposing these patches for 1.4?
>
> PATCH 1/2 is a straightforward doc fix.
>
> PATCH 2/2 cleans up a part of QAPI that has never been released,
> before it's too late. If we're already beyond the point where we can
> do that, too bad,
On 02/13/13 15:54, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Why am I proposing these patches for 1.4?
>
> PATCH 1/2 is a straightforward doc fix.
>
> PATCH 2/2 cleans up a part of QAPI that has never been released,
> before it's too late. If we're already beyond the point where we can
> do that, too bad, we'l
