On 11/27/2012 01:14 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 26.11.2012 15:25, schrieb Gerd Hoffmann:
>> On 11/25/12 16:01, Andreas Färber wrote:
>>> Am 25.11.2012 10:10, schrieb Avi Kivity:
On 09/19/2012 02:50 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
> This is the tenth version of patch series about ioport registr
Am 26.11.2012 15:25, schrieb Gerd Hoffmann:
> On 11/25/12 16:01, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Am 25.11.2012 10:10, schrieb Avi Kivity:
>>> On 09/19/2012 02:50 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
This is the tenth version of patch series about ioport registration.
Some part of QEMU still use register
On 11/25/12 16:01, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 25.11.2012 10:10, schrieb Avi Kivity:
>> On 09/19/2012 02:50 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
>>> This is the tenth version of patch series about ioport registration.
>>>
>>> Some part of QEMU still use register_ioport* functions to register ioport.
>>> These fu
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Thanks, queued for the v1.4 merge window:
> https://github.com/afaerber/qemu-cpu/commits/memory-ioport
>
> Julien: When pinging a patch series, please make sure it actually still
> applies. This needed to be rebased both onto the target_phy
On 2012-11-25 16:40, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 11/25/2012 05:01 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
>>
>> Note that there are still some register_ioport_*() usages left:
>> $ git grep register_ioport -- hw/ | grep -v isa_register_ioport | wc --lines
>> 32
>>
>
> For the record, my plan for when that number dro
On 11/25/2012 05:01 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
>
> Note that there are still some register_ioport_*() usages left:
> $ git grep register_ioport -- hw/ | grep -v isa_register_ioport | wc --lines
> 32
>
For the record, my plan for when that number drops to zero was to use
address_space_rw() (or fri
Am 25.11.2012 10:10, schrieb Avi Kivity:
> On 09/19/2012 02:50 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
>> This is the tenth version of patch series about ioport registration.
>>
>> Some part of QEMU still use register_ioport* functions to register ioport.
>> These functions doesn't allow to use Memory Listener on
On 11/25/2012 02:42 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 25.11.2012 10:10, schrieb Avi Kivity:
>> On 09/19/2012 02:50 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
>>> This is the tenth version of patch series about ioport registration.
>>>
>>> Some part of QEMU still use register_ioport* functions to register ioport.
>>> The
Am 25.11.2012 10:10, schrieb Avi Kivity:
> On 09/19/2012 02:50 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
>> This is the tenth version of patch series about ioport registration.
>>
>> Some part of QEMU still use register_ioport* functions to register ioport.
>> These functions doesn't allow to use Memory Listener on
On 09/19/2012 02:50 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
> This is the tenth version of patch series about ioport registration.
>
> Some part of QEMU still use register_ioport* functions to register ioport.
> These functions doesn't allow to use Memory Listener on it.
Acked-by: Avi Kivity
Unfortunately, I n
On 11/24/2012 03:09 AM, Julien Grall wrote:
> ping ?
>
Sorry, I must have missed this (twice).
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
ping ?
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 09/19/2012 12:50 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
>
> > This is the tenth version of patch series about ioport registration.
> >
> > Some part of QEMU still use register_ioport* functions to register
> ioport.
> > These functions doesn't all
On 09/19/2012 12:50 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
> This is the tenth version of patch series about ioport registration.
>
> Some part of QEMU still use register_ioport* functions to register ioport.
> These functions doesn't allow to use Memory Listener on it.
>
> Modifications between V1 and V2:
>
13 matches
Mail list logo
