Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v4 00/16] qemu: towards virtio-1 host support

2014-11-28 Thread Cornelia Huck
On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 18:38:59 +0200 "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote: > Also, let's focus on one device, e.g. -net for now. Yes, I'm currently looking at net. > Then probably virtio scsi. > That's because blk needs to be reworked to support ANY_LAYOUT. I had focused on blk because that's the other de

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v4 00/16] qemu: towards virtio-1 host support

2014-11-28 Thread Cornelia Huck
On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 18:35:40 +0200 "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote: > On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 05:28:42PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 18:18:25 +0200 > > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 05:06:51PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > > > > > So we shou

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v4 00/16] qemu: towards virtio-1 host support

2014-11-27 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 05:28:42PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 18:18:25 +0200 > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 05:06:51PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > > > So we should have a per-device callback into the transport layer, say > > > check_legacy(

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v4 00/16] qemu: towards virtio-1 host support

2014-11-27 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 05:28:42PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 18:18:25 +0200 > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 05:06:51PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > > > So we should have a per-device callback into the transport layer, say > > > check_legacy(

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v4 00/16] qemu: towards virtio-1 host support

2014-11-27 Thread Cornelia Huck
On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 18:18:25 +0200 "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote: > On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 05:06:51PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > So we should have a per-device callback into the transport layer, say > > check_legacy()? > > I would just have 2 masks: legacy_features and features. But these b

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v4 00/16] qemu: towards virtio-1 host support

2014-11-27 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 05:06:51PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 17:42:11 +0200 > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 04:31:39PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > > On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 17:24:22 +0200 > > > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu,

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v4 00/16] qemu: towards virtio-1 host support

2014-11-27 Thread Cornelia Huck
On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 17:42:11 +0200 "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote: > On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 04:31:39PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 17:24:22 +0200 > > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 04:16:33PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > > > Yet another ver

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v4 00/16] qemu: towards virtio-1 host support

2014-11-27 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 04:31:39PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 17:24:22 +0200 > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 04:16:33PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > > Yet another version of the virtio-1 support patches. > > > > > > This one has seen some (ve

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v4 00/16] qemu: towards virtio-1 host support

2014-11-27 Thread Cornelia Huck
On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 17:24:22 +0200 "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote: > On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 04:16:33PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > Yet another version of the virtio-1 support patches. > > > > This one has seen some (very) light testing with the virtio-1 guest > > support patches currently on vh

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC v4 00/16] qemu: towards virtio-1 host support

2014-11-27 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 04:16:33PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > Yet another version of the virtio-1 support patches. > > This one has seen some (very) light testing with the virtio-1 guest > support patches currently on vhost-next. > > Changes from v3: > > - Add support for FEATURES_OK. We refu