On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 09:22:20PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 13 May 2013 21:00, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > apic has its own version of bitops, with the
> > difference that it works on u32 and not long.
> > Add apic_ prefix to avoid namespace clashes.
>
> Wouldn't it be better to consoli
On 13 May 2013 21:00, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> apic has its own version of bitops, with the
> difference that it works on u32 and not long.
> Add apic_ prefix to avoid namespace clashes.
Wouldn't it be better to consolidate so we only have
one set of bitops rather than a local set in this file
