On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 05:39:11PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 08:02:27AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 01:34:41PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 03:22:29PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Wed, May 29, 201
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 08:02:27AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 01:34:41PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 03:22:29PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 09:04:00PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > > > On Wed, May 29, 201
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 01:34:41PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 03:22:29PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 09:04:00PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 01:17:13PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Wed, May 29, 201
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 03:22:29PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 09:04:00PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 01:17:13PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 08:06:42PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > > > On Wed, May 29, 201
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 09:04:00PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 01:17:13PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 08:06:42PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:55:53PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Wed, May 29, 201
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 01:17:13PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 08:06:42PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:55:53PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 07:43:41PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > > > On Thu, May 23, 201
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 08:06:42PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:55:53PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 07:43:41PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 10:16:27PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > > > On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 0
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:55:53PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 07:43:41PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 10:16:27PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 02:22:30PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Thu, May 09, 201
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 07:43:41PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 10:16:27PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 02:22:30PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 10:31:10AM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > > > Currently pci_get_primary
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 07:43:41PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 10:16:27PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 02:22:30PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 10:31:10AM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > > > Currently pci_get_primary
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 10:16:27PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 02:22:30PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 10:31:10AM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > > Currently pci_get_primary_bus() searches the list of root buses for one
> > > with domain 0. B
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 10:16:13PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 02:01:57PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 10:31:10AM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > > Currently pci_get_primary_bus() searches the list of root buses for one
> > > with domain 0. B
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 02:22:30PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 10:31:10AM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > Currently pci_get_primary_bus() searches the list of root buses for one
> > with domain 0. But since host buses are always registered with domain 0,
> > this just
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 02:01:57PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 10:31:10AM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > Currently pci_get_primary_bus() searches the list of root buses for one
> > with domain 0. But since host buses are always registered with domain 0,
> > this just
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 10:31:10AM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> Currently pci_get_primary_bus() searches the list of root buses for one
> with domain 0. But since host buses are always registered with domain 0,
> this just amounts to finding the only PCI host bus.
>
> This simplifies the implemen
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 10:31:10AM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> Currently pci_get_primary_bus() searches the list of root buses for one
> with domain 0. But since host buses are always registered with domain 0,
> this just amounts to finding the only PCI host bus.
>
> This simplifies the implemen
16 matches
Mail list logo