On Fri, 6 May 2011 20:33:24 +0200
Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 06.05.2011, at 19:40, Scott Wood wrote:
>
> > OK, it looked like it was being limited to only FSL. I missed that
> > PPC_BOOKE and PPC2_BOOKE_FSL are the same "kind" of flags despite being in
> > different words. Does PPC_BOOKE not r
On 06.05.2011, at 19:40, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Fri, 6 May 2011 12:01:11 +0200
> Alexander Graf wrote:
>
+for (i = env->nb_tlbs[0]; i < env->nb_tlb; i++) {
+tlb = &env->tlb[i].tlbe;
+ret = mmubooke_check_tlb(env, tlb, &raddr, &ctx->prot, address,
rw,
>>>
On Fri, 6 May 2011 12:01:11 +0200
Alexander Graf wrote:
> >> +for (i = env->nb_tlbs[0]; i < env->nb_tlb; i++) {
> >> +tlb = &env->tlb[i].tlbe;
> >> +ret = mmubooke_check_tlb(env, tlb, &raddr, &ctx->prot, address,
> >> rw,
> >> + access_type, i)
On 03.05.2011, at 21:25, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Mon, 2 May 2011 17:03:21 +0200
> Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>> Most of the code to support e500 style MMUs is already in place, but
>> we're missing on some of the special TLB0-TLB1 handling code and slightly
>> different TLB modification.
>>
>> Thi
On Mon, 2 May 2011 17:03:21 +0200
Alexander Graf wrote:
> Most of the code to support e500 style MMUs is already in place, but
> we're missing on some of the special TLB0-TLB1 handling code and slightly
> different TLB modification.
>
> This patch adds support for the FSL style MMU.
>
> Signed-
