On Wed, 13 Sep 2017 12:31:20 +0200
Halil Pasic wrote:
> I think, in absence of further complaints or concrete ideas I will go
> with the more structured variant (second one) for v2. I would like
> to post a v2 soon to avoid juggling to much stuff in head.
Yeah, let's see v2. Maybe someone else c
On 09/13/2017 11:58 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Sep 2017 20:08:16 +0200
> Halil Pasic wrote:
>
>> On 09/06/2017 03:10 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>>> On Tue, 5 Sep 2017 13:16:44 +0200
>>> Halil Pasic wrote:
>>>
Let's add indirect data addressing support for our virtual channel
On Mon, 11 Sep 2017 20:08:16 +0200
Halil Pasic wrote:
> On 09/06/2017 03:10 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Tue, 5 Sep 2017 13:16:44 +0200
> > Halil Pasic wrote:
> >
> >> Let's add indirect data addressing support for our virtual channel
> >> subsystem. This implementation does no prefetchin
On 09/06/2017 03:10 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Sep 2017 13:16:44 +0200
> Halil Pasic wrote:
>
>> Let's add indirect data addressing support for our virtual channel
>> subsystem. This implementation does no prefetching, but steps
>> trough the idal as we go.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Halil
On Tue, 5 Sep 2017 13:16:44 +0200
Halil Pasic wrote:
> Let's add indirect data addressing support for our virtual channel
> subsystem. This implementation does no prefetching, but steps
> trough the idal as we go.
>
> Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic
> ---
> hw/s390x/css.c | 110
>
