On 06/05/2016 22:53, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> +route->kroute.type = kvm_has_msi_x2apic() ?
> KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_MSI_X2APIC
> + : KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_MSI;
> route->kroute.flags = 0;
Perhaps using flags here instead of a new route type gives
2016-05-07 16:03+0200, Jan Kiszka:
> On 2016-05-06 22:53, Radim Krčmář wrote:
>> The capability alows us to express x2APIC destinations.
>
> "allows"
Thanks. :)
> Will the possibility to create >254 CPUs be indirectly coupled to this
> capability, or should userland check for it explicitly then?
On 2016-05-06 22:53, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> The capability alows us to express x2APIC destinations.
"allows"
Will the possibility to create >254 CPUs be indirectly coupled to this
capability, or should userland check for it explicitly then?
Will the kernel handle the case gracefully that AMD CPUs
