On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 06:08:45PM +0200, Juan Quintela wrote:
> Peter Xu wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 09:45:22PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
> >> It was on MigrationState when it is only used inside ram.c for
> >> postcopy. Problem is that we need to access it without being able to
> >> pa
Peter Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 09:45:22PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
>> It was on MigrationState when it is only used inside ram.c for
>> postcopy. Problem is that we need to access it without being able to
>> pass it RAMState directly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela
>> ---
>>
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 09:45:22PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
> It was on MigrationState when it is only used inside ram.c for
> postcopy. Problem is that we need to access it without being able to
> pass it RAMState directly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela
> ---
> include/migration/migratio