On 05/10/2012 05:01 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 10.05.2012 09:05, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
Il 09/05/2012 22:01, Igor Mammedov ha scritto:
Hi Paolo,
Are you plannig to respin this and related patches?
If yes, when?
After the first part goes in (21 patches including Anthony's bus
series). A re
Am 10.05.2012 09:05, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> Il 09/05/2012 22:01, Igor Mammedov ha scritto:
>> Hi Paolo,
>>
>> Are you plannig to respin this and related patches?
>> If yes, when?
>
> After the first part goes in (21 patches including Anthony's bus
> series). A reviewed-by from Andreas or Anthon
Il 09/05/2012 22:01, Igor Mammedov ha scritto:
> Hi Paolo,
>
> Are you plannig to respin this and related patches?
> If yes, when?
After the first part goes in (21 patches including Anthony's bus
series). A reviewed-by from Andreas or Anthony would help, so that I
can make Andreas's suggested do
Hi Paolo,
Are you plannig to respin this and related patches?
If yes, when?
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 01:15:51PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Since we had to move the state field from DeviceState to Object, we cannot
> delay the implementation of the "realized" property. The property is
> a trigg
Am 03.04.2012 15:03, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> Il 03/04/2012 14:11, Andreas Färber ha scritto:
>> Since this patch is clearly an extended version of my realize patch
>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/148752/, it should carry my SoB, as
>> reminded last night. If you don't want my SoB on the parts
Hi,
I'm about to board a plane but I at least want to comment that we should
all give each other the benefit of the doubt in a situation like this.
Everyone on this thread is a long term contributer to QEMU that has more
than earned the right not to be accussed of impropriety. Let's all take a
de
Il 05/04/2012 15:31, Andreas Färber ha scritto:
> Here's how I see it:
>
> * You add a realize callback to ObjectClass like I did, you add the
> Error** parameter that was requested as feedback to mine.
> * You add a static object_realize() method that clashes with my
> introducing it as a public
Am 05.04.2012 14:36, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> Il 05/04/2012 14:04, Andreas Färber ha scritto:
>> Am 03.04.2012 15:03, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
>>> Il 03/04/2012 14:11, Andreas Färber ha scritto:
Since this patch is clearly an extended version of my realize patch
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/
Il 05/04/2012 14:04, Andreas Färber ha scritto:
> Am 03.04.2012 15:03, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
>> Il 03/04/2012 14:11, Andreas Färber ha scritto:
>>> Since this patch is clearly an extended version of my realize patch
>>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/148752/, it should carry my SoB, as
>>> remi
Il 03/04/2012 14:11, Andreas Färber ha scritto:
> Since this patch is clearly an extended version of my realize patch
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/148752/, it should carry my SoB, as
> reminded last night. If you don't want my SoB on the parts I didn't do -
> namely unrealize and *_childen -
Paolo,
Am 03.04.2012 13:15, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> Since we had to move the state field from DeviceState to Object, we cannot
> delay the implementation of the "realized" property. The property is
> a trigger for two actions that propagate through the composition tree.
> "Realize" is called whe
11 matches
Mail list logo
