On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 04:41:45PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 10 March 2015 at 16:32, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 03:22:55PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> I'm confused. Even if we're using the simple-permissions
> >> model, the ap parameter is still AP[2:0]. Shouldn't
On 10 March 2015 at 16:32, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 03:22:55PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> I'm confused. Even if we're using the simple-permissions
>> model, the ap parameter is still AP[2:0]. Shouldn't this
>> switch be for cases 0, 2, 4, 6 ?
>
> Depends on how we choose t
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 03:22:55PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 12 February 2015 at 15:05, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > Teach get_rw_prot about the simple AP format AP[2:1]. An additional
> > switch was added, as opposed to converting ap := AP[2:1] to AP[2:0]
> > with a simple shift - and then modi
On 12 February 2015 at 15:05, Andrew Jones wrote:
> Teach get_rw_prot about the simple AP format AP[2:1]. An additional
> switch was added, as opposed to converting ap := AP[2:1] to AP[2:0]
> with a simple shift - and then modifying cases 0,2,4,6, because the
> resulting code is easier to read wit
