Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 10/12] linux-user: clock_nanosleep errno Handling on PPC

2014-08-04 Thread Tom Musta
On 8/4/2014 12:43 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 4 August 2014 17:45, Tom Musta wrote: >> The clock_nanosleep syscall is unusual in that it returns positive >> numbers in error handling situations, versus returning -1 and setting >> errno, or returning a negative errno value. On POWER, the kernel

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 10/12] linux-user: clock_nanosleep errno Handling on PPC

2014-08-04 Thread Peter Maydell
On 4 August 2014 17:45, Tom Musta wrote: > The clock_nanosleep syscall is unusual in that it returns positive > numbers in error handling situations, versus returning -1 and setting > errno, or returning a negative errno value. On POWER, the kernel will > set the SO bit of CR0 to indicate failure

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 10/12] linux-user: clock_nanosleep errno Handling on PPC

2014-08-04 Thread Peter Maydell
On 4 August 2014 17:45, Tom Musta wrote: > The clock_nanosleep syscall is unusual in that it returns positive > numbers in error handling situations, versus returning -1 and setting > errno, or returning a negative errno value. On POWER, the kernel will > set the SO bit of CR0 to indicate failure