On 8/4/2014 12:43 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 4 August 2014 17:45, Tom Musta wrote:
>> The clock_nanosleep syscall is unusual in that it returns positive
>> numbers in error handling situations, versus returning -1 and setting
>> errno, or returning a negative errno value. On POWER, the kernel
On 4 August 2014 17:45, Tom Musta wrote:
> The clock_nanosleep syscall is unusual in that it returns positive
> numbers in error handling situations, versus returning -1 and setting
> errno, or returning a negative errno value. On POWER, the kernel will
> set the SO bit of CR0 to indicate failure
On 4 August 2014 17:45, Tom Musta wrote:
> The clock_nanosleep syscall is unusual in that it returns positive
> numbers in error handling situations, versus returning -1 and setting
> errno, or returning a negative errno value. On POWER, the kernel will
> set the SO bit of CR0 to indicate failure