> On 06/04/2013 02:23 PM, Alon Levy wrote:
> > Used by the followin patch.
>
> s/followin/following/
Thanks.
>
> >
> > +int qemu_pipe_non_block(int pipefd[2])
> > +{
> > +int ret;
> > +
> > +ret = qemu_pipe(pipefd);
>
> qemu_pipe() already uses pipe2() when available; it seems like i
On 06/04/2013 02:23 PM, Alon Levy wrote:
> Used by the followin patch.
s/followin/following/
>
> +int qemu_pipe_non_block(int pipefd[2])
> +{
> +int ret;
> +
> +ret = qemu_pipe(pipefd);
qemu_pipe() already uses pipe2() when available; it seems like it would
be nicer to use pipe2's O_NO
On 4 June 2013 21:23, Alon Levy wrote:
>
> +int qemu_pipe_non_block(int pipefd[2])
> +{
> +int ret;
> +
> +ret = qemu_pipe(pipefd);
> +if (ret) {
> +return ret;
> +}
> +if (fcntl(card->pipe[0], F_SETFL, O_NONBLOCK) == -1) {
> +return -errno;
> +}
> +if (
