On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 07:10:52PM +, Herve Poussineau wrote:
> From: Herv? Poussineau
>
> This option is described in RFC 1783. As this is only an optional field,
> we may ignore it in some situations and handle it in some others.
> Here, if client requests a block size bigger than the block
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 7:16 PM, Hervé Poussineau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yes, I've tried booting with PXELINUX and gPXE, and I didn't see any
> problem.
Great. Thanks for confirming.
Stefan
Hi,
Yes, I've tried booting with PXELINUX and gPXE, and I didn't see any
problem.
Hervé
Stefan Hajnoczi a écrit :
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 07:10:52PM +, Herve Poussineau wrote:
From: Herv? Poussineau
This option is described in RFC 1783. As this is only an optional field,
we may ign
On 04/11/2011 10:10 PM, Herve Poussineau wrote:
From: Herv� Poussineau
Note: your charset is UTF-8 but this is Latin-1 (I think). Please use
consistent charsets.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 07:10:52PM +, Herve Poussineau wrote:
> From: Herv? Poussineau
>
> This option is described in RFC 1783. As this is only an optional field,
> we may ignore it in some situations and handle it in some others.
> Here, if client requests a block size bigger than the block
