On 29.02.2012 20:07, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 29/02/2012 17:00, Michael Tokarev ha scritto:
>> And how it will be a cleanup?
>>
>> The whole cow code (and a few others) is not reenterant. Merely
>> moving this lock/unlock stuff inth actual methods eliminates two
>> current wrappers in cow_co_writ
Il 29/02/2012 17:00, Michael Tokarev ha scritto:
> And how it will be a cleanup?
>
> The whole cow code (and a few others) is not reenterant. Merely
> moving this lock/unlock stuff inth actual methods eliminates two
> current wrappers in cow_co_write() and cow_co_read(), which are
> exactly the s
On 29.02.2012 19:53, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 29/02/2012 00:54, Michael Tokarev ha scritto:
>> -static coroutine_fn int cow_co_write(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t
>> sector_num,
>> - const uint8_t *buf, int nb_sectors)
>> +static coroutine_fn int cow_co_rw(Bloc
Il 29/02/2012 00:54, Michael Tokarev ha scritto:
> -static coroutine_fn int cow_co_write(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t
> sector_num,
> - const uint8_t *buf, int nb_sectors)
> +static coroutine_fn int cow_co_rw(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t sector_num,
> +
