On 10/29/2016 02:36 AM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
Le 29/10/2016 à 01:25, Richard Henderson a écrit :
On 10/28/2016 03:39 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
+tcg_gen_movi_i32(QREG_CC_V, 0);
+tcg_gen_mov_i32(QREG_CC_C, QREG_CC_V);
movi CC, 0
Just to know, could you explain why it is bett
Le 29/10/2016 à 01:25, Richard Henderson a écrit :
> On 10/28/2016 03:39 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>> +tcg_gen_movi_i32(QREG_CC_V, 0);
>> +tcg_gen_mov_i32(QREG_CC_C, QREG_CC_V);
>
> movi CC, 0
Just to know, could you explain why it is better?
> Otherwise,
>
> Reviewed-by: Rich
On 10/28/2016 03:39 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
+tcg_gen_movi_i32(QREG_CC_V, 0);
+tcg_gen_mov_i32(QREG_CC_C, QREG_CC_V);
movi CC, 0
Otherwise,
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson
r~