On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 11:52:54AM -0400, John Snow wrote:
> On 06/30/2015 11:27 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 06:39:08PM -0400, John Snow wrote:
> >> On 06/25/2015 08:12 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> >>> @@ -537,6 +539,9 @@ void backup_start(BlockDriverState *bs,
> >>> Blo
On 06/30/2015 11:27 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 06:39:08PM -0400, John Snow wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 06/25/2015 08:12 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>> Join the transaction when the backup block job is in incremental backup
>>> mode.
>>>
>>> This ensures that the sync bitmap is no
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 06:39:08PM -0400, John Snow wrote:
>
>
> On 06/25/2015 08:12 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > Join the transaction when the backup block job is in incremental backup
> > mode.
> >
> > This ensures that the sync bitmap is not thrown away if another block
> > job in the trans
On 06/25/2015 08:12 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> Join the transaction when the backup block job is in incremental backup
> mode.
>
> This ensures that the sync bitmap is not thrown away if another block
> job in the transaction is cancelled or fails. This is critical so
> incremental backup wit
On Thu, 06/25 13:12, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> Join the transaction when the backup block job is in incremental backup
> mode.
>
> This ensures that the sync bitmap is not thrown away if another block
> job in the transaction is cancelled or fails. This is critical so
> incremental backup with mul
