On 04.05.2011, at 10:43, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-05-04 10:40, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>> On 04.05.2011, at 10:31, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>
>>> On 2011-05-04 07:19, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 03.05.2011, at 16:57, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-05-03 16:17, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 2011-05-04 10:40, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 04.05.2011, at 10:31, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>
>> On 2011-05-04 07:19, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>
>>> On 03.05.2011, at 16:57, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>
On 2011-05-03 16:17, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 18.04.2011, at 20:34, Aurelien Jarno wrot
On 04.05.2011, at 10:31, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-05-04 07:19, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>> On 03.05.2011, at 16:57, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>
>>> On 2011-05-03 16:17, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 18.04.2011, at 20:34, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 05:32:46PM +02
On 2011-05-04 07:19, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 03.05.2011, at 16:57, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>
>> On 2011-05-03 16:17, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>
>>> On 18.04.2011, at 20:34, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>>>
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 05:32:46PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> We have a generic stub ar
On 03.05.2011, at 16:57, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-05-03 16:17, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>> On 18.04.2011, at 20:34, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 05:32:46PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
We have a generic stub architecture for kvm calls, but some architectures
On 3 May 2011 15:17, Alexander Graf wrote:
> Maybe there's some Makefile magic to only compile the stub if the file
> exists? I certainly don't know of any.
obj-$(CONFIG_NO_KVM) += kvm-stub.o
ifneq ($(wildcard $(TARGET_PATH)/kvm-arch-stub.c),)
obj-$(CONFIG_NO_KVM) += kvm-arch-stub.o
endif
? (not
On 2011-05-03 16:17, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 18.04.2011, at 20:34, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 05:32:46PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>> We have a generic stub architecture for kvm calls, but some architectures
>>> are different from others. So we do want to be able
On 18.04.2011, at 20:34, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 05:32:46PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> We have a generic stub architecture for kvm calls, but some architectures
>> are different from others. So we do want to be able to have stubs for
>> architecture specific functiona
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 05:32:46PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> We have a generic stub architecture for kvm calls, but some architectures
> are different from others. So we do want to be able to have stubs for
> architecture specific functionality as well.
>
> This patch adds kvm stubs for all a
